Our publications are available to logged in users and by request. To access all documents, please log in or create an account. Or, click Request Document next to the document you would like, and we will email it to you.
On May 23, 2018, Derivative Path, Inc's. General Counsel & CCO Melanie Wheeler, along with Michael Best and Friedrich Partner Alexander P. Fraser, and Senior Counsel Cheryl Isaac Aaron presented a very timely discussion on LIBOR replacement. They shared a lot of information that is pertinent to banks engaged in back-to-back derivatives as well as those who use LIBOR to do any type of lending.
Late last year, Derivative Path sent out a Compliance Update with some thoughts on what could take place in 2017. As the year wraps up and we start looking forward to 2018, it is a good time to assess what progress, has been made and what potential changes are anticipated going forward.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued their Derivatives and Hedging Update on August 28, 2017. The new rules will simplify compliance, allow more hedging strategies to qualify and will more closely align the fair value measurements of a hedge with the underlying exposure. Robert Baer, Derivative Path's Head of Derivative Accounting lead a panel discussion on how the new hedge accounting provisions will impact a financial institution’s interest rate risk management policies and compliance processes. You can review the presentation here.
As expected, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued their Derivatives and Hedging Update on August 28, 2017. The new rules simplify derivative accounting compliance, allow more hedging strategies to qualify for hedge accounting treatment, and more closely align the fair value measurements of a hedge with the underlying exposure. We present our thoughts on the final rules.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) is expected to issue a final Derivatives and Hedging Update by the end of this quarter (Aug/Sept, 2017). In this research piece, we discuss our thinking behind pros and cons of early adoption of new rules and the steps to complete if an institution decides to early adopt. We also discuss an important change under a new "last of layer" method that will make it easier for financial institutions to hedge a portfolio of pre-payable assets such as MBS and ABS.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) derivative and hedging rule changes are now expected to be out in final form in August 2017 according to a news release earlier this month. The FASB noted that feedback on the coming changes has been overwhelmingly positive and well received.
Generally, the new standard was designed to better align the accounting rules with a company’s risk management activities, better reflect the economic results of hedging in the financial statements and to simplify compliance with the hedge accounting rules.
The CFTC issued limited no-action relief yesterday in response to industry requests to push out the date for compliance with the variation margin requirements (CFTC Regulation 23.153), providing swap dealers more time to put the necessary infrastructure in place. The no-action relief is time limited and only applicable under certain conditions.
Risk Participation Agreements offer financial institutions opportunities to better align target risk/reward profiles
Risk Participation Agreements (RPAs) are off-balance sheet transactions in which one bank, the agent, sells part of its exposure to a contingent obligation to another bank, the participant, for a fee. The obligation is typically in the form of an interest rate swap or other derivative contract with a commercial client. The agent bank thus reduces its commercial client credit exposure, while the participant bank creates additional fee revenue in exchange for accepting some contingent credit risk.
This document is intended to provide bank officers and relationship managers at regional and community banks with a high-level description of the mechanics of RPAs, so that they can better understand how they work, and how they can be used to either mitigate contingent counterparty credit risk or to create non-interest fee income opportunities.
Throughout the paper, a concrete example of a typical, real-world set of transactions is utilized to illustrate the concepts presented, and to demonstrate how Derivative Path’s DerivativeEDGE platform can help banks drive and manage new business opportunities through the use of derivative products.
Now that the election is over and President-Elect Trump has started the nomination process, there has been substantial speculation on whether there will be a move toward a reversal of some or all of Dodd-Frank and other financial regulation. While this would likely be a welcome change to the financial industry, the ambiguity is challenging, especially with the uncertainty surrounding scheduled regulations still due to take effect.
While the incoming administration clearly seems to favor deregulation, a complete repeal of Dodd Frank is neither practical nor likely. The large dealers have spent considerable amounts of money and time over the last five years establishing infrastructure to comply with the rules and there is a shared belief within the industry that while the regulation can be burdensome and overreaching, some elements protect the financial system and have led to safer markets.
We have summarized considerations to be mindful of going forward into this period of uncertainty.
One year ago, Derivative Path sent out a Regulatory Update (published October 27, 2015 - see below) regarding new margin rules finalized by the CFTC and Prudential Regulators. In short, these rules set guidelines for the calculation and posting of Initial (IM) and Variation Margin (VM) between parties in non-cleared/over-the-counter swap transactions -- intended to reduce systemic risk.
Ready to see how DerivativeEDGETM can work for you?
schedule a demo